Pokemon Plushies Fo Rsale

Ecosia & Co. - Green search engine

Ecosia , FORESTLE , Ecocho and Znout . These are the three currently known "green" search engine on the net. What is behind this new idea of what you do with it, and why you should do it, I will explain to you briefly.

Who ever G oogle has used and not just white AdBlock used that in a search request to the page, so-called "Sponsored Links" to see small ads on the side and above the search results so that link for example, on eBay or Amazon or selling houses to match the search input. Since so many people use Google, the customers feel well looked after. Finally, many people see their advertising. With those small ads Google earned a fortune, because who wants to be seen much, need to pay a lot.

the green search engine tuen almost exactly the same. Here, too, ads will appear next to search results. The difference is the use of the recovered money. Instead of themselves to do business in the bag here is the money that is earned with the advertising, donated a green purpose. Some are reduced to single lichen offset the CO2 emissions of their servers, others go further and plant trees and save the rain forest with the money. The user come to no cost.


Znout
Znout stands for " Z ero n egative put out" and is currently the only green search engine that works with Google together. It is also something like the minimum program, in terms of green search engines. Google works as a market leader in terms of what the search network is not combined with non-profit organizations, because you could lose customers and reduce its own profit .
why limit ourselves to Znout on the pure CO2 emissions from the server. Znout has appointed a partner (http://www.co2stats.com/) determine the emissions of carbon dioxide that cause the Znout sites and then buys an equivalent amount certificates for renewable e energies in order to discharge balance.
Znout then, is the search engine of choice for those who absolutely must have exactly the search results from Google, but at least do not emit C02 on their search queries.
LINK: Znout

FORESTLE
Forestle setzt nach anfänglichen Querelen auf Zusamennarbeit mit Yahoo , anstelle von Google, kommt aber aus dem gleichen Haus. Das Prinzip ist ebenfalls das gleiche. Über Unterstützung der " Adopt an Acre " Stiftung (http://tinyurl.com/adoptacre) werden nach Angabe pro Suche ca. 0,1 m² Regenwald gerettet. Außerdem kommt hier auch die gleiche Taktik von Znout zum Einsatz. Das heißt, zu den 0,1 m² gerettetem Regenwald kommt auch hinzu, dass Forestle - genau wie Znout - eine CO2-Neutrale Suchmaschine ist. Die Suchergebnisse sind leider nicht mit denen von Znout/Google identisch, jedoch kann sich über the quality of the two are still debated.
LINK: Forestle

Ecocho
This search engine is the only one of the four not out of the house but from Kroll Sydney. This makes itself felt in the other Anstaz. Instead of saving the rain forest are in Ecocho requests per 1000 new trees planted 1-2 which will be probably more than 100 years . This is precisely because new trees absorb a great deal C02. Ecocho is also the only green search engine that provides one own news and pictures search , which is also green. In all other accessible even link to Google.
LINK: Ecocho

Ecosia is a few days ago as "further development" touted by Forestle. Ecosia also comes from the same hands as Znout or Forestle. Through new contracts with Bing (the search engine by Microsoft) and Yahoo and the new cooperation with the WWF are now questioned by some indication Rgenwald 2 m² per search under protection (at least 20 times more than Forestle). Also Ecosia use green power for its servers. Moreover, from the ground up Ecosia professional, fast and international set, so probably the most promising Green search engine of them all.
LINK: Ecosia

What do these search engines is the idea that technology, logistics and moral superiority. What they do not have is money to place advertisements for themselves or otherwise make attention. It's up to us, the users, to disseminate these sites. there for every taste matching green search engine, to speak out does not work. Therefore, my plea to you: Verabschieded you from your old search engine and switches to the green alternative! brings And further the news. Link to the page in forums, on or on blogs and talk to your Friends about it. The more people look green, the better.

is any questions as always: comment to post, message on Twitter or YouTube. I reply as soon as possible.

tl, dr:
Tolle sustainable alternatives to Google! Find, get the same results as with Google, Yahoo or Google and the way the rain forest saves by itself! And all the costs you exactly nothing. So please use and spread the word.

Longest Herpes Out Break

Richard Dawkins does not plan to arrest the Pope!

Again has turned the tabloids an interesting message in itself through the meat grinder and all the German media after jump.

Richard Dawkins , British zoologist and professor at Oxford and solid defender of atheism, is currently all the headlines for his alleged megalomaniac idea of the Pope to denounce as "crimes against humanity" for screening of child abuse in the U.S., the team with the also from England Author Christopher Hitchens coming .
The uproar stems from an article in the Sunday Times , ie the British conservative press. The article takes you here:
-> http://tinyurl.com/timesdawkins

The German press is full on it you lost. Without confirming that of Dawkins or an explanation of the story ended up in the features section of "Süddeutsche Zeitung" today but also for example in the "World Online" ( http://tinyurl.com/ timesdawkins1 ) . My dear friends of kath.net even talk about "Atheists rampage" ( http://tinyurl.com/timesdawkins2 ) . The result

much accordingly. Dawkins is accused of confusion of facts, confusion of national and international law and of course, perfidious, blunt, non-directional Aktionismus.

Was sagt unser Inhaber Wolfgang Grupp... äh... Richard Dawkins selbst dazu?
Quelle: http://tinyurl.com/timesdawkins3 ; http://tinyurl.com/timesdawkins4

"It is now more than five hours since I submitted my Comment to the Sunday Times website, stating that their headline is a damaging lie ."

"Needless to say, I did NOT say "I will arrest Pope Benedict XVI" or anything so personally grandiloquent. [...]
What I DID say to Marc Horne [...] is that I am whole-heartedly behind the initiative by Geoffrey Robertson and Mark Stephens to mount a legal challenge to the Pope's proposed visit to Britain. Beyond that, I declined to comment to Marc Horne, other than to refer him to my 'Ratzinger is the Perfect Pope' article [...]

Den Originalartikel "Put the Pope in the dock!" im "Guardian" von Geoffrey Roberston könnt ihr hier finden:
--> http://tinyurl.com/popeinthedock

Den Artikel, den Dawkins in seinem Kommentar selbst noch erwähnt, ist "Ratzinger is the perfect Pope!" aus der "Washington Post":
--> http://tinyurl.com/perfectpope

Die Idee dieser Artikel is, above all, to shake the international recognition of the Vatican as "state" and consequently to the immunity of the Pope as head of state. All this also under the aspect that the Holy See in 1929 by Italy's fascist dictator, Benito Mussolini, just like in the "international landscape," and so on thrown subject of international law was made. could just as quasi Germany - follow this logic - Hamburg or Bayern outsource and independent subject of international law make. The UN
not have the Vatican a separate state accepted, however, given him a special observer status, and determined him Contracts can be signed (including, ironically, the Convention on the Rights of Children) can talk and topics such as abortion and contraception. This, of course, other religions - at best represented by NGOs - a disadvantage.

All this has meant that the Vatican is almost like a state acts and the Pope as head of state "under international law immunity claims, which has protected him in the U.S., a few complaints.

This is the initiative, which Dawkins supports. Grossly different from what is so common in our newspapers. The only mention of ICC (International Criminal Court - International Criminal Court) can be found in the penultimate paragraph, where it is said that the immunity from the ICC would not apply and the Holy See would do under circumstances in mind when he insists the Pope continue to adopt as head of state. For if a (quasi) government (for example) from a broad practice of sexual abuse know this and not punished, they make themselves liable to prosecution before the ICC.

That's all for today for the first time on this. I hope this is all a bit clearer now.

As always, When information is always important and often essential to listen to both sides clearly and to go to the actual sources, order not to include the media chewed misunderstandings!


Shakleton42

tl, dr:
Dawkins, the Pope will not be arrested, but he supports the idea that international recognition of the Vatican as a state - and therefore the immunity of the Pope - to challenge.