Heutzutage kann man sich ja nirgendwo mehr blicken lassen, ohne eine eigene Meinung zu dem Troll Nummer Eins dieser Tage have to: Thilo Sarrazin
front: I have not read the book and I have no plans to read it. Therefore, I do have no great opinion of the book. I know two important small ideas that come into the whole debate is often too short. You can therefore see this post as my personal footnote to the current debate:
first Islam is to blame anyway! I've heard, Sarrazin leads back many integration problems on the Islamic religion. I am amazed that it then Iranian immigrants have very little to no integration problems. Most speak excellent German well and many even have a German Abitur. Could it be that mainly intellectuals from Iran, came to Germany and from Turkey? After all, we have
paid at that time the guest workers (where the word already makes clear that it will not start on time are welcome.) Premiums yet, because we cheap, uneducated workers wanted in the country. They had to speak German or not well integrated especially that was not politically desirable. And that's why you've built up, no possibility of integration. The message to the immigrants was clear: You are not one of us, you should not do so, but you can be happy for us to do the dirty work.
Sunday and now that they are there, and have the audacity not disappear immediately after work again, is stirring the world to know that the "Stay here" have not built perfectly. I am surprised that people wonder about it. And that children learn the meaning of the word "integration" of course first of its parents, is surely clear.
is therefore clear that no hasty "Foreigners Out!" or the introduction of a German "Green Card" can be a quick solution. It must once again the stony way to go, through openness, tolerance, dialogue and the creation of good infrastructure for the integration of education and encounter.
2. 82 % der Muslime tun dies, 38 % das Gegenteil
Im Magazin der Süddeutschen Zeitung hat Sarrazin in einem Interview (siehe Quellenabteilung) zugegeben, dass er für einige seiner Behauptungen keine Quellen habe und es solche auch nicht geben würde. Mit anderen Worten: Er hat sie erfunden.
Eine Dreistigkeit an sich. Wer in einem Buch von 70 % jener un
d 90 % jener Minderheit Sachen behauptet, impliziert eine Grundlage für seine Behauptungen. Eventuell eine Studie des statistischen Bundesamtes oder dergleichen. In dem Lichte, dass Sarrazin aber einfach nur "in die richtige Richtung deuten" wollte, müssen wir uns meiner Meinung nach eine Frage stellen: How seriously can we take someone who claims to be interested in a serious discussion, and then for his own views simply invents statistics, rather than to stick to the facts?
I believe does not mean that the media vortex Sarrazin held solely in order to earn a fortune on his book. Money he can spend more than he and I admire him not to be so greedy, as he sat just more money to get this going would be trouble. But of course I can be so wrong.
I also consider it to Sarrazin like any other troll: not merely feed!
tl, dr:
In my opinion you can take Sarrazin, at best, only half serious when he admits to invent statistics and to sell them as facts to be in his book, even giving law. In addition, no quick slogans help to solve the (real) problem of integration, which is generally arose only because we have failed to operate long before true integration. Key words here are education, tolerance and dialogue.
Sources:
"Sarrazin builds up his stats for yourself!" via placebo alarm
The relevant passage from the Süddeutsche Zeitung
"What is it to Sarrazin's theses?" via Tagesschau.de
article on trolls via Wikipedia
0 comments:
Post a Comment